The Woodsman's Back-Cut and the Strategy of a Deliberate Bind
There’s a piece of productivity advice so ubiquitous it has the ring of gospel: ‘Do the hard thing first.’ Tackle the most difficult, most dreaded item on your list at the start of the day, when your willpower is at its peak. They call it ‘eating the frog,’ a metaphor gruesome enough to capture the expected unpleasantness. It’s a philosophy of preemptive conquest, of clearing the biggest hurdle so the rest of the day is an easy downhill coast. I have come to believe this is, for a certain category of profound work, precisely backwards.
Consider a woodsman felling a large tree. The final, decisive cut that brings the giant down is called the back-cut. But it is not the first cut made. Before it comes the notch, a precise, angled cut on the side facing the intended direction of fall. The woodsman does not attack the most structurally critical point first. Instead, he creates a deliberate weakness, a calculated bind. This initial cut seems like a lesser task, a preliminary. Yet it is the notch that controls the entire operation. It guides the tremendous force of the falling tree, ensuring it lands exactly where intended, safely and effectively. Without it, the back-cut is merely an act of chaos, likely to result in a deadly, unpredictable snap.
We are often taught to make the back-cut first—to charge at the monolithic project, the complex report, the intricate creative problem, with raw morning energy. But what if that initial burst of effort simply causes the task to fall unpredictably, pinning us underneath its sprawling, unmanaged consequences? The real work, the work that demands more than brute force, is the work of the notch.
For me, the ‘notch’ is the quiet, almost administrative labour that precedes the main event. It is not the writing of the chapter, but the creation of a detailed, annotated outline. It is not the coding of the entire module, but the careful diagramming of data flows on a whiteboard. It is not the difficult conversation, but the act of writing down my true objectives and anticipating the other person’s perspective. This work feels secondary, even easy. It lacks the heroic satisfaction of ‘crushing’ a big task. It can feel like procrastination dressed in intellectual clothing.
But this is the strategic bind. By investing time in this directional work first, I am not avoiding the hard part; I am ensuring that when I finally apply the force of my full concentration—perhaps later in the day when creative thinking is more fluid—the effort is channeled. The path is set. The project falls into place with a satisfying certainty, rather than collapsing into a tangled mess that requires endless, exhausting salvage operations. The initial, easier cut makes the final, harder cut not only easier, but intelligently effective.
So, I’ve stopped trying to eat the frog for breakfast. Instead, I spend the first hour of my day setting the notch. I prepare the groundwork, define the direction, create the guiding weakness. Then, later, I apply the saw to the back-cut. The tree always falls true.
Notes & further reading
A few pages I came back to while writing this:
- a practical rundown
- The Composer's Scrap-Paper and the Use of a Stolen Moment
- Little Rock, AR
- The Weaver's Loom-Lease and the Space for a Crossed Thread
- Gilbert, AZ
- The Lamplighter's Pin and the Logic of a Small Circuit
- Peoria, AZ
- Surprise, AZ
- Elk Grove, CA
- Pasadena, CA
- New Haven, CT
- Stamford, CT
- Washington, DC